Sci-Fi Confusion

FAQ | Search | Register | Login
View unanswered posts | View active topics | View your posts
Want to talk, specifically, about RPGs? Then post it here. Questions, comments, and views are all welcomed.

Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby ragr » 12:55pm on 26 May 12

I need some opinions based on experience of playing some of the sci-fi games currently out there; I know that this is a topic that has a similar feel to some other threads but, having read those, I'm none the wiser on choosing a game. I've also scoured the net looking for reviews and, again, have hit a brick wall in the decision making process.

I intend to play by post on a forum that I use but may do an occasional FTF session if it can be arranged with a widely scattered player base. The game therefore needs to be easy enough to run by post so no reliance on minis or maps to successfully resolve actions.

What feel do I want? Very simplistic on my part but, more Event Horizon/Aliens than Star Wars/Trek.
One essential factor; there must be a decent supply of ready to play scenarios as I'm devoting prep time to an FTF and haven't got much to spare to the pbp format.

So far I've looked at the following;

Traveller; a game I've run in its d6, Marc Miller iteration, but not for a good 15+ years. Loved it then but it seems to have multiple versions now and I'm not sure whether it's "current" enough.

2300; okay, it's Traveller basically but it looks like what I want feel wise. There seems to be some criticism of the system, however.

Eclipse Phase; some fantastic reviews but what a monster rule book and I have a suspicion that may deter players. There seem to be a fair few setting books but not a lot of scenarios.

Fading Suns; I love the look of this game and setting but, to my horror again, a lot of different versions of the game.

Blue Planet; this one looks like a great setting again but will it limit those players who like a little shipside action. And, not many scenarios?

BRP; I use BRP for my main tabletop campaign, it works well and my players know it. There are plenty of monographs with adventures but , how well does it cope with sci-fi?

All help is gratefully received.

Cheers in advance.
ragr
8th-level
User avatar
Location: Frinton On Sea, Essex
Thanks: 321 given/183 received
Playing: DCC G+, D&DNext,
Running: CoC "King Of Chicago", G+ Esoterrorists
Planning: Hmm, what to do?

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby old timer » 1:23pm on 26 May 12

Ok, well i run a couple of traveller games on a PbP forum, and it works well, the core of the system is easy to learn. I use mongoose traveller, and there are a couple of good campaigns already written, the latest one, the pirates of Drinax is available free on their site, and a few others that are printed and available to buy.
I cant see BRP having any problems running a sci fi game either face to face or via PbP. Blue planet is very 'planet side' sci fi, and has very few scenarios for it. Eclipse phase is a monster rule book, and might be too involved for PbP, and again only a few published scenarios out for it.
Hope this helps, though i, being a traveller fan boy, would of course say go for traveller out of the above options but that just me. :)
New years resolution, to post and damn the consequences.

My blog,http://noeloc1.blogspot.co.uk/
A setting for MGP legend (work in progress) The isle of Valnos
old timer has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
old timer
6th-level
Location: Oxford
Thanks: 199 given/128 received
Playing: Nothing at the moment
Running: Pirates of Drinax (Traveller), Isle of Valnos (Legend setting), Earthdawn
Planning: Dungeon world, Attack squadron roswell.

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby Stronty Girl » 1:45pm on 26 May 12

The older version of 2300AD had quite a few scenarios published for it - you might be able to find some of those on ebay or the like. The ones I've got are:

Deathwatch Programme (starts on Earth, ends up with a space battle).
Rotten to the Core (sourcebook on the city around Earth's space elevator, plus a scenario of bioterrorists and corporate espionage).
Beanstalk (3 linked scenarios set on and around Beta Canum's space elevator, plus sourcebook on the elevator).
Bayern (2 scenarios set on a scientific exploration ship).
Kafer Dawn (war with the Kafers).
And the Nyotekundu sourcebook has a mini scenario set on a mining station.
And the Ranger sourcebook has scenarios, but really only for ranger characters.

Challenge Magazine (some issues now available on the web) was also a good source of scenarios for 2300AD, MegaTraveller, cyberpunky things and the like.
Stronty Girl a.k.a. Dr Bob.
In a game with 5 players and 1 GM, at any one time there are AT LEAST 6 different versions of the Cunning Plan being carried out...
Stronty Girl has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
Stronty Girl
Dice Funder
User avatar
Location: Bristol, UK
Thanks: 158 given/220 received
Playing: Things that keep getting cancelled
Running: Ashen Stars
Planning: Various science fiction things

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby Evilgaz » 2:06pm on 26 May 12

ragr wrote:Blue Planet; this one looks like a great setting again but will it limit those players who like a little shipside action. And, not many scenarios?

The original two systems are shonky. There's a Savage Worlds edition in the works though and its very nice. Each of the original source books has scenarios, there's lots of scenario seeds, and there's a fair amount on the web, but most of it does require some work, and there's not a dedicated scenario book or anything.

Given what you're after, Traveller is a good option, even if you just use it to nick adventures from.
Evilgaz has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
Evilgaz
Evil Alien Overlord
User avatar
Location: Nottingham
Thanks: 1568 given/1676 received
Playing: Iron Kingdoms
Running: Savage Worlds, Hot War
Planning: Deadlands, Lot5R

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby ragr » 2:10pm on 26 May 12

Stronty Girl wrote:The older version of 2300AD had quite a few scenarios published for it - you might be able to find some of those on ebay or the like. The ones I've got are:

Deathwatch Programme (starts on Earth, ends up with a space battle).
Rotten to the Core (sourcebook on the city around Earth's space elevator, plus a scenario of bioterrorists and corporate espionage).
Beanstalk (3 linked scenarios set on and around Beta Canum's space elevator, plus sourcebook on the elevator).
Bayern (2 scenarios set on a scientific exploration ship).
Kafer Dawn (war with the Kafers).
And the Nyotekundu sourcebook has a mini scenario set on a mining station.
And the Ranger sourcebook has scenarios, but really only for ranger characters.

Challenge Magazine (some issues now available on the web) was also a good source of scenarios for 2300AD, MegaTraveller, cyberpunky things and the like.


Is that version d20?
ragr
8th-level
User avatar
Location: Frinton On Sea, Essex
Thanks: 321 given/183 received
Playing: DCC G+, D&DNext,
Running: CoC "King Of Chicago", G+ Esoterrorists
Planning: Hmm, what to do?

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby ragr » 2:13pm on 26 May 12

old timer wrote: there are a couple of good campaigns already written, the latest one, the pirates of Drinax is available free on their site,


Consider that "purchased", then. :shock:
ragr
8th-level
User avatar
Location: Frinton On Sea, Essex
Thanks: 321 given/183 received
Playing: DCC G+, D&DNext,
Running: CoC "King Of Chicago", G+ Esoterrorists
Planning: Hmm, what to do?

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby w00hoo » 3:01pm on 26 May 12

Bit late to the party, but for your requirements I'd agree. Traveller.

I play a bit of it, I don't think it's that great as a system (it feels old to me because it retains a lot of the feel of the original and so is.) but it does the job. Most importantly, there's loads of stuff out there for it.

The party need to be willing to 'just go with the scenario' probably (definitely the case with Tripwire which is what we're playing through. There are some real hoops to jump through for no obvious reason aside from 'the scenario says jump through some hoops') but that goes for a lot of pre-written stuff and more so for SF which can be a difficult genre to play.

If you were happy with old traveller, Mongoose Traveller should slot in quite easily.
"I don't want to remember. But if I don't have the memories, nobody will, so I can't forget." - Samantha.
w00hoo has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
w00hoo
King of the Scribblers
User avatar
Location: Maidstone - Kent
Thanks: 1271 given/1269 received
Playing: Pendragon, The Quiet Year (PBF), TOR (G+)
Running: DitV, Supernatural, BtVS
Planning: De Profundis, SFLRP

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby Stronty Girl » 12:12pm on 27 May 12

Is that version d20?


No, they were for the original version (Traveller 2300) and second edition (renamed 2300ad). The system was stats of 4d6 and skills of roll over a set difficulty on d10.
Stronty Girl a.k.a. Dr Bob.
In a game with 5 players and 1 GM, at any one time there are AT LEAST 6 different versions of the Cunning Plan being carried out...
Stronty Girl has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
Stronty Girl
Dice Funder
User avatar
Location: Bristol, UK
Thanks: 158 given/220 received
Playing: Things that keep getting cancelled
Running: Ashen Stars
Planning: Various science fiction things

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby Newt » 4:21pm on 27 May 12

ragr wrote:BRP; I use BRP for my main tabletop campaign, it works well and my players know it. There are plenty of monographs with adventures but , how well does it cope with sci-fi?


Cthulhu Rising by John Ossoway is your off the peg solution here. In the background book the mythos elements are a very light touch, in fact reserved to a single chapter, and easily ignored leaving you with a gritty "Cigarettes in the Ashtray" * type setting that takes in elements from Philip K Dick & Aliens.

River of Heaven, also by John, which will be out later this year, takes its cues from the like of Alstair Reynolds' Revelation Space and the Dune series. Its inspired by alot of "not quite Transhuman/Singularity" sci-fi.
Newt has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
Newt
D101 Games
User avatar
Location: Oldham Uk
Thanks: 143 given/82 received
Running: Dungeon World
Planning: Wordplay Cyberpunk, Old School D&D, Monkey & 101 other things

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby ragr » 6:38pm on 27 May 12

Newt wrote:
ragr wrote:BRP; I use BRP for my main tabletop campaign, it works well and my players know it. There are plenty of monographs with adventures but , how well does it cope with sci-fi?


Cthulhu Rising by John Ossoway is your off the peg solution here. In the background book the mythos elements are a very light touch, in fact reserved to a single chapter, and easily ignored leaving you with a gritty "Cigarettes in the Ashtray" * type setting that takes in elements from Philip K **** & Aliens.

River of Heaven, also by John, which will be out later this year, takes its cues from the like of Alstair Reynolds' Revelation Space and the Dune series. Its inspired by alot of "not quite Transhuman/Singularity" sci-fi.


Thanks, Newt.

I've also had a look at Operation Ulysses which looks decent although no reviews anywhere.
ragr
8th-level
User avatar
Location: Frinton On Sea, Essex
Thanks: 321 given/183 received
Playing: DCC G+, D&DNext,
Running: CoC "King Of Chicago", G+ Esoterrorists
Planning: Hmm, what to do?

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby GuyMilner » 7:20pm on 27 May 12

I was about to post about how 90% of Eclipse Phase is background, rather than rules (which are basically D100 in format), but then realised this wasn't much help as you'll still need your players to have at least nodding familiarity with said background. And this is the dilemma with sci-fi, in my experience; it's very hard to start play without a bit of background knowledge.

If you want your players up and running ASAP, then Traveller and 2300AD are pretty straightforward settings to get one's head around - although this can also be a problem with Traveller as it can suffer from a dearth of plot unless you populate your setting - and PCs - with plenty to motivate them.

In your situation, if I wanted setting familiarity on a plate, then I'd be looking at either Star Wars Saga (I know, you said no minis - but I'd run Saga without them and just handwave everything - esp. in PbF) or one of FFG's W40K games. If I wanted a system that's easier to bend to my will, I'd go for a genuinely easy-to-adapt one, like Savage Worlds or Heroquest, and run it in the background indicated.

Although Traveller has the advantage of both easy-to-pick-up setting and fast-and-dirty system, so probably fits your bill better.
GuyMilner has received thanks from the following for this post:
Evilgaz, ragr
GuyMilner
8th-level
Thanks: 205 given/266 received
Running: 3:16

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby ragr » 5:27pm on 29 May 12

I'm surprised that no-one's expressed any views on Fading Suns; it has the look of a love or hate game to me.

Maybe it's just ho-hum, then.
ragr
8th-level
User avatar
Location: Frinton On Sea, Essex
Thanks: 321 given/183 received
Playing: DCC G+, D&DNext,
Running: CoC "King Of Chicago", G+ Esoterrorists
Planning: Hmm, what to do?

Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby Kaiserjez » 6:34pm on 29 May 12

Fading Suns seems to be in trouble at the minute. 3rd ed was due but they sacked the lead writer a few weeks ago an have left themselves a couple of months to release a different version by GenCon.
But there's plenty of stuff available for 2nd ed out there.
"And, when the doctor said I didn't have worms any more, that was the happiest day of my life."
Pompey Crew Achievements; Arse Like A Japanese Flag, Harry Redknapp'd, Pompey Social, Crash At Mick's, Spend a Penny, Safety in Numbers, Pass The Arse Gravy, The Jonny Gray's Brother Maneuver, Make Mine A Guinness, The Third Troll, Broken!, Gash Tats, Hello Sailor, Informed judgement, Dedication's what you need, The Fly, It's not trolling if..., Thundercats! Ho!
Kaiserjez has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
Kaiserjez
Jonny Gray's Brother
User avatar
Location: Plymouth
Thanks: 640 given/694 received
Playing: Nothing
Running: Nowt.
Planning: Not a lot

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby dpmcalister » 6:47pm on 29 May 12

I picked up the Fading Suns Players Guide a few years ago on the recommendation of DigitalMage. Liked the background but I wasn't keen on the system.

---
Sent from my HTC Desire Z using Tapatalk 2
My administrator/moderator voice is RED

UK Role Players Affiliate Schemes: Amazon.co.uk :: CafePress :: DriveThruRPG :: D&D Classics :: ProFantasy :: RPGNow
dpmcalister has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
dpmcalister
Administrator
User avatar
Location: Lincoln
Thanks: 2099 given/959 received
Running: WFRP 1st Edition
Planning: UK Games Expo scenarios

Re: Sci-Fi Confusion

Postby dr_mitch » 7:26pm on 29 May 12

Fading Suns is a great background, coupled with, as dpm says, a ho-hum system. But it's as much fantasy as SF (and I wouldn't have it any other way), and doesn't much sound like what you're looking for. On another note, if you're looking for Fantasy crossed with SF, Hellas is really good. But that's going way off-topic.
Paul Mitchener, Maths Sensei

Author: Blood of the Gods (Wild Talents in Ancient Greece), Drowned Lands (a wet post-apocalypse based on Deluge, in Worlds of Wordplay), Age of Arthur (with Graham Spearing)(Fate-based dark ages fantasy).

Coming Soon: Here Be Dragons (with Simon Bray)(an OpenQuest fantasy setting mixing the whimsical and the dark), Tomb of the Necromancers (a Crypts and Things scenario).

In the Pipeline: Reign: Ninth Legion (a fantasy setting involving the descendants of the lost Ninth Legion of the Roman Empire)
dr_mitch has received thanks from the following for this post:
ragr
dr_mitch
Dice Funder
User avatar
Location: Sheffield
Thanks: 1278 given/792 received
Planning: More than you can possibly imagine

Next

Return to Open RPG Discussion



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC [ DST ]